Possible alternatives if your data violate F test assumptions

Click here for free Online Virus Check from Panda Antivirus

Google

Web This Site

Featured Article: Where to start...

Documents for quality control plans, internal audit plans, ISO 9001, ISO 9001:2000, management systems, mil-i-45208, QC manuals, quality control manuals, quality control systems, quality management systems, total quality management

Get Adobe
 
Construction
Manuals
Procedures
FAA
Forms
Kits
ISO
Gov

Helpful Links
 
Basics
Copyright
Link Directory
Link Exchange
Privacy
Resources
SPC Definitions
Stat Guide
Where-to-Start

Non-Tech Links
 
Cool Tool
Frustration
Inspiration
Opinion
Nonsense
Serious


Sponsored Links
 

 

Possible alternatives if your data violate F test assumptions


If the data for one or both of the samples to be analyzed by a F test come from a population whose distribution violates the assumption of normality, or outliers are present, then the F test on the original data may provide misleading results. Using a nonparametric or robust test may provide a better analysis. Or, simply examining the data graphically may suffice.

Unless you have other reasons to transform the data to get to your true variable of interest (such as being actually interested in speed of performing a task instead of time to its completion, which would suggest taking reciprocals of the collected time data), transformation is generally not appropriate for dealing with nonnormality in comparing two sample variances. A transformation that cures the nonnormality problem often results in making the variances more equal, defeating the purpose of the test!

Alternative procedures:


Looking for variance differences without tests:
The sample variance is sensitive to outliers. Other sample statistics such as the interquartile range, may give an idea of the variation in either sample without being affected by outliers. If the sample interquartile ranges are similar, but the sample variances are quite different, an outlier in one or both the samples may be the cause. It is also possible that outliers could make two sample variances similar, while the interquartile ranges differ. When the two sets of dispersion measures disagree, outliers in one or both of the samples may be the reason.

Side-by-side boxplots of the two samples can suggest differences between the two sample variances if one boxplot is much longer than the other, and reveal suspected outliers.

Nonparametric tests:
Nonparametric tests are tests that do not make the usual distributional assumptions of the normal-theory-based tests. For the unpaired two-sample t test, the most common nonparametric alternative test is the Ansari-Bradley test Although the Ansari-Bradley test does not assume normality of the distributions for the two sample populations, it does assume that either the two populations have the same unknown median, or that both population medians are known, so that each population median can be subtracted beforehand from the values in the corresponding sample. Otherwise, the test is no longer distribution-free, even if the sample median is subtracted from the values in each corresponding sample. Also, as with the F test, it is assumed that the two samples are independent of each other, and that there is independence within each sample.

If the sampled values do indeed come from populations with normal distributions, then the F test is the most powerful test of the equality of the two means, meaning that no other test is more likely to detect an actual difference between the two variances.

Robust tests:
Robust statistical tests operate well across a wide variety of distributions. A test can be robust for validity, meaning that it provides P values close to the true ones in the presence of (slight) departures from its assumptions. It may also be robust for efficiency, meaning that it maintains its statistical power (the probability that a true violation of the null hypothesis will be detected by the test) in the presence of those departures. Levene's test is reasonably robust for validity against nonnormality. Another test created by Box and Anderson may be more powerful than Levene's test when nonnormality is caused by heavy-tailedness.

Examine the glossary.

Back to StatGuide home page.

Get Adobe to read our PDF evaluation docs.
 

Satisfaction Guaranteed!

If you are unsatisfied with your purchase, you may return it within 30 days for an exchange, credit or refund. This guarantee does not cover electronic download products, special requests requiring photocopying or engineering aids; however, if you cannot edit our document(s) in your MS Word, Excel or Visio program we will fix it or give you a refund.

Can't find what you're looking for...?
Please call, Fax or Email Us at:

Office: (719) 649-4242
Fax: (719) 573-4205
Home Page

Click here to bookmark At-PQC™ then visit our Toolbox to find a quality control plan that will help you achieve an effective and efficient business infrastructure that focuses on customer satisfaction, continuous improvement and desirable cost savings. Visit with us today for comprehensive assistance in developing or choosing the right quality control plan for your business. Click here to visit our extensive selection of quality control plans, policies, procedures and forms or click here for help with where-to-start.

 

We can interact with you anywhere in the USA from 8:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday except holidays.

At-PQC™
JnF Specialties, LLC
664 Greenscape Lane
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80916-5534
Office: (719) 649-4242
Fax: (719) 573-4205
Email Us at:

Send an email to request next-day support or call our helpline at 719-649-4242 during your office hours Mon - Fri except holidays.

Click here to let us know how we're doing.

Get Adobe | About Us | Site Map | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Policies | Procedures | FAA | Forms | Kits | ISO | Gov
Copyright © 1998-2005 JnF Specialties, LLC. All rights reserved.