Examining Kaplan-Meier results to detect assumption violations

Click here for free Online Virus Check from Panda Antivirus

Google

Web This Site

Featured Article: Where to start...

Documents for quality control plans, internal audit plans, ISO 9001, ISO 9001:2000, management systems, mil-i-45208, QC manuals, quality control manuals, quality control systems, quality management systems, total quality management

Get Adobe
 
Construction
Manuals
Procedures
FAA
Forms
Kits
ISO
Gov

Helpful Links
 
Basics
Copyright
Link Directory
Link Exchange
Privacy
Resources
SPC Definitions
Stat Guide
Where-to-Start

Non-Tech Links
 
Cool Tool
Frustration
Inspiration
Opinion
Nonsense
Serious


Sponsored Links
 

 

Examining Kaplan-Meier results to detect assumption violations


A typical Kaplan-Meier step function plot will have short horizontal runs (the steps) at the beginning, when there are many subjects and relatively short times between deaths, and longer steps in later stages of the experiment, when there are fewer subjects and the wait between noncensored survival times becomes longer.

If there are relatively few or no tied or censored values, the vertical drops (the risers) for the steps will all be about the same in height. If a vertical drop is particularly long, there may be tied values or many censored values in a particular interval.

The individual observations can be examined for signs of lack of independence or lack of uniformity in the censoring. When examining Kaplan-Meier results, you should keep these potential problems in mind, along with the possibility of implicit factors not surfaced in the data.

The problems detectable from the Kaplan-Meier results themselves are often related to problems due to lack of data.

Examining results for a Kaplan-Meier calculation:


Lack of independence of censoring:
You should be alert to the possibility of systematic patterns in the censoring, For example, if there are many values censored earlier in the experiment rather than later, there may have been a change of conditions during the experiment. (For example, one physician may have withdrawn referred patients early on while other doctors did not.) If there was a relatively large number of censored values in a short span of time, then the censorings may be related. (For example, a physician transfers to another hospital, and all referred patients suddenly leave the study.)

A common problem with a survival analysis experiment studying medical treatments is that patients who do not do well one or more of the treatments must be withdrawn from the study, so that sicker patients may be more likely to have censored survival times.

Many censored values:
If there are many censored values, the Kaplan-Meier table estimates become less reliable, and the estimated variances may be considerably smaller than the actual variances.

If many subjects are censored at approximately the same time, the possibility of a common cause should be considered. This would violate the assumption of independence of censoring and survival times.

If many subjects are left alive at the end of the study, the study may simply not have continued long enough to give reliable estimates. If the last observation is censored, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival can not reach 0.

Many tied values:
Kaplan-Meier's product-limit estimator for survival assumes that the intervals between deaths are small enough that it is unlikely that there will be tied survival values. If there are many such tied values, then the survival estimates may be less reliable. Also, tied survival values may point to the presence of implicit factors in the data.

Small sample sizes:
Small sample sizes tend to lead to wide intervals (the times between successive noncensored survival times), raising the question of whether the assumption of a constant survival probability within each interval is appropriate. High censoring rates also reduce the effective sample size for subsequent intervals. If the final interval(s) of a study contain only a few subjects, the Kaplan-Meier estimates for those intervals are not reliable, and should not be given much weight.


Examine the glossary.

Back to StatGuide home page.

Get Adobe to read our PDF evaluation docs.
 

Satisfaction Guaranteed!

If you are unsatisfied with your purchase, you may return it within 30 days for an exchange, credit or refund. This guarantee does not cover electronic download products, special requests requiring photocopying or engineering aids; however, if you cannot edit our document(s) in your MS Word, Excel or Visio program we will fix it or give you a refund.

Can't find what you're looking for...?
Please call, Fax or Email Us at:

Office: (719) 649-4242
Fax: (719) 573-4205
Home Page

Click here to bookmark At-PQC™ then visit our Toolbox to find a quality control plan that will help you achieve an effective and efficient business infrastructure that focuses on customer satisfaction, continuous improvement and desirable cost savings. Visit with us today for comprehensive assistance in developing or choosing the right quality control plan for your business. Click here to visit our extensive selection of quality control plans, policies, procedures and forms or click here for help with where-to-start.

 

We can interact with you anywhere in the USA from 8:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday except holidays.

At-PQC™
JnF Specialties, LLC
664 Greenscape Lane
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80916-5534
Office: (719) 649-4242
Fax: (719) 573-4205
Email Us at:

Send an email to request next-day support or call our helpline at 719-649-4242 during your office hours Mon - Fri except holidays.

Click here to let us know how we're doing.

Get Adobe | About Us | Site Map | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Policies | Procedures | FAA | Forms | Kits | ISO | Gov
Copyright © 1998-2005 JnF Specialties, LLC. All rights reserved.