Possible alternatives if your data violate one-sample t test assumptions

Click here for free Online Virus Check from Panda Antivirus

Google

Web This Site

Featured Article: Where to start...

Documents for quality control plans, internal audit plans, ISO 9001, ISO 9001:2000, management systems, mil-i-45208, QC manuals, quality control manuals, quality control systems, quality management systems, total quality management

Get Adobe
 
Construction
Manuals
Procedures
FAA
Forms
Kits
ISO
Gov

Helpful Links
 
Basics
Copyright
Link Directory
Link Exchange
Privacy
Resources
SPC Definitions
Stat Guide
Where-to-Start

Non-Tech Links
 
Cool Tool
Frustration
Inspiration
Opinion
Nonsense
Serious


Sponsored Links
 

 

Possible alternatives if your data violate one-sample t test assumptions


If the data to be analyzed by a one-sample t test come from a population whose distribution violates the assumption of normality, or outliers are present, then the t test on the original data may provide misleading results, or may not be the most powerful test available. In such cases, transforming the data or using a nonparametric test may provide a better analysis.

Alternative procedures:

  • Transformations: correcting nonnormality by transforming all the data values
  • Nonparametric tests: dealing with nonnormality by employing a test that does not make the normality assumption of the t test

Transformations:
Transformations (a single function applied to each data value) are applied to correct problems of nonnormality. For example, taking logarithms of sample values can reduce skewness to the right. Unless scientific theory suggests a specific transformation a priori, transformations are usually chosen from the "power family" of transformations, where each value is replaced by x**p, where p is an integer or half-integer, usually one of:

  • -2 (reciprocal square)
  • -1 (reciprocal)
  • -0.5 (reciprocal square root)
  • 0 (log transformation)
  • 0.5 (square root)
  • 1 (leaving the data untransformed)
  • 2 (square)

For p = -0.5 (reciprocal square root), 0, or 0.5 (square root), the data values must all be positive. To use these transformations when there are negative and positive values, a constant can be added to all the data values such that the smallest is greater than 0 (say, such that the smallest value is 1). (If all the data values are negative, the data can instead be multiplied by -1, but note that in this situation, data suggesting skewness to the right would now become data suggesting skewness to the left.) To preserve the order of the original data in the transformed data, if the value of p is negative, the transformed data are multiplied by -1.0; e.g., for p = -1, the data are transformed as x --> -1.0/x. Taking logs or square roots tends to "pull in" values greater than 1 relative to values less than 1, which is useful in correcting skewness to the right. Transformation involves changing the metric in which the data are analyzed, which may make interpretation of the results difficult if the transformation is complicated. If you are unfamiliar with transformations, you may wish to consult a statistician before proceeding.

Nonparametric tests:
Nonparametric tests are tests that do not make the usual distributional assumptions of the normal-theory-based tests. For the one-sample t test, the most common nonparametric alternative tests are the one-sample Wilcoxon one-sample signed rank test and the one-sample sign test. Although the signed rank test does not assume normality of the distribution for the sample population, it does assume that they come from the same, symmetric distribution. Thus the signed rank test will not address the problem of skewness. Also, as with the one-sample t test, it is assumed that the values in the sample are independent of each other.

Although the Wilcoxon one-sample signed rank test is the most commonly used nonparametric alternative to the one-sample t test, it is not the only one. However, all tests assume that the data values are independent.

The one-sample sign test can be calculated for data values even when only the direction (+ or -) of the difference from the hypothesized mean value is known. This means that it can be applied in situations when the one-sample signed rank test, which requires at least knowledge of the relative ranks and directions (signs) of the differences between each data value and the hypothesized value, can not be used. Unlike the signed rank test, the sign test does not assume symmetry of the population distribution for the sample, but is likely to be less powerful than the one-sample signed rank test when that distribution is in fact symmetric. If the distribution is extremely heavy-tailed, the sign test may be more powerful than either the one-sample signed rank test or the one-sample t test.

If the data values do indeed come from a population with a normal distribution, then the t test is the most powerful test of the equality of the population mean and the hypothesized value, meaning that no other test is more likely to detect an actual departure. (If a distribution is symmetric, its mean and median are both equal to the center of symmetry. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, the t test can also be viewed as testing whether the population median is different from the hypothesized value, if the normality assumption holds.) If the population distribution of the sample is not normal, however, the signed rank test may be more powerful at detecting differences between the population median and the hypothesized value.

Because the signed rank test is nearly as powerful as the one-sample t test in the case of data from a normal distribution, and may be substantially more powerful in the case of nonormality, the one-sample rank test is well suited to analyzing data when outliers are suspected, even if the underlying distribution is close to normal.


Examine the glossary.

Back to StatGuide home page.

Get Adobe to read our PDF evaluation docs.
 

Satisfaction Guaranteed!

If you are unsatisfied with your purchase, you may return it within 30 days for an exchange, credit or refund. This guarantee does not cover electronic download products, special requests requiring photocopying or engineering aids; however, if you cannot edit our document(s) in your MS Word, Excel or Visio program we will fix it or give you a refund.

Can't find what you're looking for...?
Please call, Fax or Email Us at:

Office: (719) 649-4242
Fax: (719) 573-4205
Home Page

Click here to bookmark At-PQC™ then visit our Toolbox to find a quality control plan that will help you achieve an effective and efficient business infrastructure that focuses on customer satisfaction, continuous improvement and desirable cost savings. Visit with us today for comprehensive assistance in developing or choosing the right quality control plan for your business. Click here to visit our extensive selection of quality control plans, policies, procedures and forms or click here for help with where-to-start.

 

We can interact with you anywhere in the USA from 8:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday except holidays.

At-PQC™
JnF Specialties, LLC
664 Greenscape Lane
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80916-5534
Office: (719) 649-4242
Fax: (719) 573-4205
Email Us at:

Send an email to request next-day support or call our helpline at 719-649-4242 during your office hours Mon - Fri except holidays.

Click here to let us know how we're doing.

Get Adobe | About Us | Site Map | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Policies | Procedures | FAA | Forms | Kits | ISO | Gov
Copyright © 1998-2005 JnF Specialties, LLC. All rights reserved.